PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
WBA vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between WBA and ^GSPC is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

WBA vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (WBA) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
19.96%
8.93%
WBA
^GSPC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WBA:

-0.65

^GSPC:

2.06

Sortino Ratio

WBA:

-0.82

^GSPC:

2.74

Omega Ratio

WBA:

0.90

^GSPC:

1.38

Calmar Ratio

WBA:

-0.44

^GSPC:

3.13

Martin Ratio

WBA:

-0.90

^GSPC:

12.84

Ulcer Index

WBA:

43.40%

^GSPC:

2.07%

Daily Std Dev

WBA:

59.77%

^GSPC:

12.87%

Max Drawdown

WBA:

-87.93%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

WBA:

-81.13%

^GSPC:

-1.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WBA achieves a 34.19% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 1.96% return. Over the past 10 years, WBA has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of -13.26%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.51% annualized return.


WBA

YTD

34.19%

1M

29.07%

6M

19.96%

1Y

-38.85%

5Y*

-21.28%

10Y*

-13.26%

^GSPC

YTD

1.96%

1M

2.12%

6M

8.93%

1Y

25.43%

5Y*

12.52%

10Y*

11.51%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WBA vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WBA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WBA is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WBA is 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WBA is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WBA is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WBA is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WBA is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WBA vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (WBA) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for WBA, currently valued at -0.65, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.652.06
The chart of Sortino ratio for WBA, currently valued at -0.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.822.74
The chart of Omega ratio for WBA, currently valued at 0.90, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.901.38
The chart of Calmar ratio for WBA, currently valued at -0.44, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.443.13
The chart of Martin ratio for WBA, currently valued at -0.90, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.9012.84
WBA
^GSPC

The current WBA Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WBA and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.65
2.06
WBA
^GSPC

Drawdowns

WBA vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WBA drawdown since its inception was -87.93%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBA and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-81.13%
-1.54%
WBA
^GSPC

Volatility

WBA vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (WBA) has a higher volatility of 27.65% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 5.07%. This indicates that WBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
27.65%
5.07%
WBA
^GSPC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab